Published on: 25 Aug 2014
It is estimated that over 400 Kit Kat fingers are consumed every second worldwide and every 5 minutes enough Kit Kat fingers are produced to out stack the Eiffel Tower.
Whilst most people associate Kit Kat with its red wrapper alongside the classic wafer and chocolate taste, Nestlé actually segment the market rather nicely in a number of countries. They produce a range of flavours which are only available in certain countries according to local tastes. In simple terms they are dividing the market (segmenting) and then adjusting the marketing mix accordingly.
In Japan for example, Nestlé recently launched 19 new flavours. These flavours reflect the food specialities of certain districts and are only sold in these specific districts.
Different flavours are available in other countries (segments). For example, peanut butter flavour can be bought in Canada.
Now, originating from Scotland where my favourite dish was crispy cod and chips my obvious question to Nestlé is:
“When will a fish and chip flavoured Kit Kat be released in Scotland?”
I feel it’s only a matter of time so if any marketing executives from Nestlé are reading this then over to you…
You get a safe hotel and a great bed. The towels and TV will cost you extra but what about the toilet paper?
Published on: 20 Jul 2014
The Tune Hotel chain has just opened up its first hotel in the UK. The chain already has 7 hotels in Malaysia and 2 in Indonesia and they claim they offer 5 star beds at 1 star prices.
Their policy is to offer the essentials that people look for in a hotel such as safety, cleanliness and comfortable beds whilst at the same time removing a number of “extras” that some customers don’t necessarily want.
With rooms starting at £35 it certainly offers great value for London hotels. It wouldn’t suit everyone’s taste though as some of the things that people take for granted at a hotel are not included in the standard price.
There are a number of optional extras that guests can purchase. A towel for example can be provided for £1.50 per stay whilst the use of a hairdryer will set you back £2. If you want to watch TV you’ll need to pay £3 a day.
If you’re the type of person that likes to take your own towel to a hotel or is relaxed about whether or not you wash then you could end up with a very cheap room.
Whilst this hotel wouldn’t be everyone’s “cup of tea” (incidentally there are no coffee or tea making facilities in the rooms) there will certainly be a market for people that only want a clean and safe hotel room to sleep in and are not bothered about the extras.
In the past we’ve blogged about the BMI Weymouth hospital that was adopting a differentiation approach to business. With Tunes Hotels adopting a hospitality industry equivalent to the low cost airline models of Easy Jet and Ryan Air, this is a great example of either a cost leadership approach or Bowman’s no-frills strategy.
Guests can rest assured though that toilet paper is included in the price and is not an optional extra.
Published on: 06 Feb 2014
…wear a tie.
Japan is famous for the long hours that some of their office workers undertake but there is now an invention that will maybe ease things a little bit for hardworking office staff.
A new tie called “Nemuri Tie” is now on sale in Japan.
Nemuri Tie means pillow tie in Japanese and if the advertising is anything to go by it will enable hard pressed office workers to grab a quick sleep at their desk.
It’s a relatively simple design in that it’s a normal looking tie but it’s got an inflatable pillow in it which can be blown up to provide a handy place to rest your head when you fancy a nap.
It can be inflated when the user is wearing it so there’s no need to keep on taking your tie off and putting it back on every time you fancy a sleep.
The Sleep Tie is currently on sale for just under £20.
It’s not clear whether the tie is stain proof for anyone that dribbles in their sleep.
Published on: 29 Sep 2013
Picture the scene. You’re the boss. You’re married and you find your assistant very attractive. Your wife finds out about this and demands that you fire your assistant.
a) Tell your wife that you don’t like your assistant and hope she believes you,
b) Admit it and then ask you assistant to leave and pay her a fair termination payment, or
c) Fire your assistant because she was an “irresistible attraction”?
Bizarrely enough, a court in the US state of Iowa has just unanimously ruled that it is legal to fire employees if they are seen as an “irresistible attraction” even if the employee hasn’t done anything wrong.
The background to the case was that lawyers for 53 year old Dentist James Knight argued that he fired his 32 year old assistant to save his marriage and that this did not represent discrimination.
In other words, he didn’t discriminate against his employee because she was good looking but rather it was in the interest of saving his marriage.
I can’t help thinking that maybe the dentist and his wife got the better deal out of this compared to his assistant as the background to the case was that the dentist had worked with his (attractive) assistant for 10 years but his wife only found out about some “personal texts” between the two of them towards the end of the 10 years.
After the texts were discovered the dentist then complained to his wife that he found his assistant’s clothing too tight and distracting (an interesting point to note here is that he didn’t complain to his wife about this for 10 years until his wife found the text messages but hey ho let’s just move on).
So, in summary a 53 year old man found a 21 year younger woman attractive. His wife found out and to save the marriage the younger employee had to go.
Rather than make a reasonable termination payment it was decided to fire the younger woman because she was too attractive!
The fired employee then took the case to court where in the opinion of probably a lot of people a bizarre decision was made by the court that this did not represent discrimination and was acceptable.
So, in Iowa it looks like it’s acceptable to fire a lady if she’s too attractive.
Oh and in case you’re interested, the decision was made by Iowa’s high court which contains only men and not women…
Published on: 04 Aug 2013
According to our IT guys, over the last 3 months 24% of you that visited our website used the Mozilla Firefox web browser.
The other main browsers used were Internet Explorer, Google Chrome and Apple Safari.
Personally I use the Firefox browser and am very happy with it (well, to be honest as happy with an internet browser as any normal person should be…)
However, things may be changing and there probably are some very worried people at Firefox.
Whilst nothing public has been said I’m sure the senior guys at Firefox are scratching their heads trying to find a solution to a potentially massive problem.
The problem isn’t because their browser is weak. In fact, far from it as apparently a lot of IT specialists love the Firefox browser due to its various add-ons.
No, the problem lies in the fact that it’s a single product company and there’s currently a move away from computers to Smartphones. In terms of the product lifecycle the Firefox product is arguably at the maturity stage and heading towards the decline.
In the UK the number of Smartphones now being sold is greater than the number of computers. Today’s average Smartphone is now more powerful than the typical computer found on your desk only a few years ago.
So, why is this switch to using Smartphones to access the internet a problem for Firefox?
Well, last week’s announcement by Nokia of their new Lumia 800 and the Lumia 710 Smartphones showed that they have dropped their own operating systems and will be using Microsoft’s new Windows Phone 7.5 system.
This system will use the mobile version of Internet Explorer to access web pages on the move.
The other browser big boys already have their Smartphone relationships. Google’s Android system is on HTC and Samsung phones whilst Apple iPhones use the safari browser.
So, in terms of Smartphone romances there are:
HTC/Samsung + Android (Google Chrome)
Apple iPhone + Safari
Nokia + Microsoft (internet explorer)
Unfortunately for Firefox that leaves them desperately looking for the Smartphone love of their life and there aren’t too many potential partners out there looking for a date…
Published on: 19 Jul 2013
Any organisation that can create a barrier to entry which prevents new competitors entering the market can, in theory, keep prices high.
Economies of scale (think Airbus or Boeing), branding (think Apple) and distribution channels (think Coke) are all excellent examples of barriers to entry but one of the toughest barriers to break through are government licenses.
If a licence is needed to operate in that industry then that is the ultimate barrier. After all, without the license the company can’t operate.
Japan is the home of sushi and as you would expect some of the top sushi restaurants can be found in Tokyo.
Sushi is fish and we all know that fish is healthy for you. It may come as a surprise then that one particular sushi delicacy in Japan could end up killing you rather quickly if it is prepared incorrectly.
Certain parts of the poisonous blowfish are considered by many to be the ultimate in sushi. It tastes gorgeous although to be honest I’ve never tried it so I’m taking somebody else’s word for this.
I’ve never tried it because I’ve never had the opportunity although even if I did have the opportunity I would have a few doubts. The reason is that as well as the edible parts of the fish, some of the organs of the fish are filled with poison called tetrododoxin which is more deadly than cyanide.
Now, if you’re eating blowfish then one thing for sure is that you want the chef to know what he or she is doing. You don’t want them making a little slip of the knife and including by mistake some of the poison as before you have a chance to say “does this fish taste a bit funny to you?” you would be on your way to a quick death.
The Japanese government have therefore heavily regulated this part of the sushi industry and there are only a handful of locations that have a licence to prepare and serve blowfish.
In October though new laws are coming into place which remove the need for a licence (or to use business strategy terminology, remove a barrier to entry).
So the good news for anyone that fancies trying some of the blowfish is that it’s likely to become a bit cheaper after October. The question though is whether price will be the key decision making factor when people are deciding to eat a meal which if prepared incorrectly could quickly kill you…
Published on: 03 Jul 2013
Sometimes people can be in the office and come up with a great idea. Whoever it was that came up with this idea at the Fiat office in Sweden should in my opinion get a bonus.
There are creative guys in many offices but my feeling is that what happened below was more of a “thought of on the spot” idea rather than a project that was planned weeks ahead.
The Google “Street View” website is a great site and enables people to (as the name suggests!) see the street view of many locations around the world.
The panoramic photos on the site are taken by special Google Street View cars that have roof mounted cameras on them.
Over in Scandinavia it looks like a creative individual at the Fiat offices in Sweden saw that a Google Street car was in the area and followed it before getting ahead of it and quickly stopping outside the main entrance to their rivals, Volkswagen.
Anyone who currently does a search on Google Street view for Volkswagen Sodertalje offices in Sweden will see an image of a lovely red Fiat 500 parked right outside the main entrance to the Swedish Volkswagen offices.
Brilliant! A great bit of creative thinking and guerrilla marketing by Fiat.
To be honest it’s probably pretty good for Volkswagen as well. After all, there are now no doubt more people who have seen the image of their offices in Sweden than would have been the case if a Volkswagen was parked outside instead of a shiny new red Fiat 500.
Published on: 18 Jun 2013
Despite car companies spending millions on R&D and new product launches one of the first questions people tend to ask if you say you’ve bought a new car is “what colour is it?”
Up until recently the most likely answer to that question would have been “silver”.
However, after 10 years at the top of the popularity car colour charts silver has fallen to the number 2 position.
The most popular car colour according to leading transportation coatings company, PPG Industries, is now white.
According to their figures 21% of this year’s new cars across the globe have been finished in white.
There are however some regional differences. Namely:
Asia/Pacific – silver 25%, white 23% and black 17%
Europe – black 26%, white 19% and silver 16%
North America – white 20%, silver 19% and black 18%
According to a PPG survey, more than 75% of car buyers said exterior colour was a factor in their purchase decision but as the above figures show though there doesn’t appear to be a huge variety in colours with the 3 main colours of white, black and silver dominating.
But what about the colour red though? After all, our ExP logo has a big red dot in the middle so we like the colour red.
Well, an interesting study in the European Journal of Social Psychology has identified that if a lady wants to make herself more attractive to men then she should consider wearing more red colours.
The study concludes that
“In two experiments, we investigate an analogous effect in humans, specifically, whether red on a woman’s shirt increases attraction behavior in men. In Experiment 1, men who viewed an ostensible conversation partner in a red versus a green shirt chose to ask her more intimate questions. In Experiment 2, men who viewed an ostensible interaction partner in a red versus a blue shirt chose to sit closer to her.
No doubt the marketeers are already onto this so does this mean that we’ll now see car companies starting to promote red cars for single ladies?
Published on: 11 Jun 2013
Love them or hate them but low cost airlines such as Ryan Air and EasyJet are here to stay.
Since low cost airlines entered the airline industry 20 odd years ago they have shaken up the industry.
Easyjet for example now carry more passengers than any other UK airline and the Irish airline Ryanair long ago surpassed the Irish national carrier Aer Lingus in terms of revenue and passenger numbers.
These airline’s business models are classic no-frills low cost models where passengers don’t pay a lot but in return don’t get a lot.
In effect they only get the flight and they have to pay for everything else. Ryanair passengers for example that don’t print out their boarding card at home are charged the princely sum of £40 to have it printed at the airport.
There are reports though that Ryanair are considering taking the no-frills approach to a new level.
To keep the cost of training crew and maintaining spares at a minimum, Ryanair only have one type of plane – a Boeing 737-800. This model of plane has 3 toilets on board but Ryanair want to remove 2 of these toilets so that they can fit an extra 6 seats on the plane. This will then free up space for 6 more fee paying passengers.
Their existing capacity on their standard plane is 189 so removing 2 toilets will raise their passenger capacity by 3%.
Ryanair have reportedly said that the additional revenue generated by this extra passenger capacity could result in the average price of a flight ticket being reduced by £2. There would of course no doubt be extra profit for them as well from these extra passengers.
This extra revenue for them would be pretty good but if you look at it from another viewpoint there could be some uncomfortable logistical issues on board.
With 195 passengers and 6 crew all sharing the one toilet there could be a fairly long queue of people going down the aisle of the plane waiting for the toilet to be freed up.
The risk of a certain type of mid-air accident will no doubt increase although the real worry of course is if you see both pilots at the back of the queue hoping up and down with their legs crossed…
Published on: 08 Jun 2013
Have you ever dropped a cup of coffee at work? What about spilling a glass of water?
Maybe a more interesting question to ask a forklift truck driver that (currently) works for the Kerry Logistics in Australia is “have you ever dropped a container full of 462 cases of a customer’s wine that were worth £664,000 and all the bottles were smashed?”
Unfortunately for this unlucky forklift truck driver the answer is yes.
The container held 2010 Mollydooker Velvet Glove Shiraz bottles of wine produced by winemaker Sparky Marquis which sell for £122 each.
Mr Marquis told reporters that he was “gut wrenched” that the wine bottles had been smashed. The container held one third of his winery’s annual production and was destined for delivery to the United States.
There are two important business lessons to be learnt from this.
Firstly, always make sure that valuable items are insured. Sensibly the wine was insured so the winemaker won’t be out of pocket.
Secondly, there’s no harm in having a sense of humour.
Mr Marquis was quoted as saying that when the logistics company opened up the container “they said it was like a murder scene.” With a touch of classic Australian humour he added “but it smelled phenomenal”
Author Robert Louis Stevenson once wrote “Wine is bottled poetry”.
I can imagine the words that came out of the forklift driver’s mouth when the container was dropped were anything but poetry.