Published on: 18 Nov 2011
I’m willing to bet that nearly all of you have used a Microsoft product. Probably an equally high proportion have used Google and a reasonably significant number of you will own an Apple product.
What about LinkedIn? Most of you have no doubt heard of it and a number of you will be registered with the website.
But did you know that Microsoft currently has one of 9.40, Apple has one of 13.61, Google has one of 20.30 and LinkedIn has one of well, … well, you’ll just have to wait a moment to hear the figure as it’s rather impressive.
So, what figures am I talking about?
The figures mentioned above refer to the PE ratio or the Price Earnings ratio.
In an attempt to astound you with my knowledge, the Price Earnings ratio measures… (wait for it)… the ratio of Price to Earnings (a round of applause please for that brilliant explanation).
In other words, the share price of Microsoft for example is such that the market is currently prepared to pay 9.40 times the earnings to own it.
The PE ratio is also sometimes known as the “price multiple”, “earnings multiple” or simply “multiple” and whilst share prices can be affected by a number of different things, a high PE ratio generally implies that the market is expecting earnings to rise in the future.
If we round up the PE ratios of the companies above we get:
That other tech giant on the market, LinkedIn currently has a PE ratio of 1,498 (yes, 1,498).
Wow – that’s not bad is it?
So hang on. A PE ratio this high implies that the market has factored in an expectation of significant growth in earnings for LinkedIn.
This really is an expectation of pretty significant growth as at the moment for every $1 of current earnings an investor gets he or she has to pay $1,498.
So, for the sake of the LinkedIn shareholders let’s hope that in the future more people become linked in.
Published on: 14 Apr 2010
“These are contracts, transacted over an exchange, representing a standard amount of currency which can be bought or sold with a specified future settlement (delivery) date, at a rate expressed in another currency. Settlement is guaranteed by the exchange, which acts as counterparty.”
Currency futures, interest rate futures and even relatively obscure items such as soya bean futures are all currently traded.
Last week however an application was made to the US futures regulator to create a contracts market for film futures. If the application is successful this will mean that there will be a “movie derivatives” exchange.
In simple terms this will enable people to “bet” on whether a movie makes money or is a financial failure. Traders will be able to buy and sell contracts speculating on how much money a movie will make at the box office.
As an example of how movie futures could work, a futures contract could be bought by a trader valued at say $1 for every $1m in expected ticket sales during the first month. Therefore, if the market believes a movie would make $100m, traders would be able to buy a futures contract for $100.
If box office estimates were to rise to say $150m because of positive movie critic reviews in the run up to the movie launch, holders of existing contracts would be able to resell them for $150. This would result in a profit of $50.
Of course, if the reviews aren’t very good then the box office estimates would decrease and the value of the contracts would go the other way and there would be a loss!
There are two opposing views to this.
Some people say that this offers a new, novel way for movie producers to manage their financial risk.
Last week however, the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) joined forces with producers and cinema owners to oppose the move on the basis that it would encourage speculation, financial irresponsibility and could be harmful to film releases.
To be honest though as an ACCA P4 tutor I find all this so interesting that I personally think they should make a film out of it – surely it would be a box office hit?