fb

Auditors are good at lots of things but could we spot what’s happening to the bees?

Auditors are good at lots of things but could we spot what’s happening to the bees?

I often believe that society at large does not get best value for money from auditors.

That’s not to say that we deliver bad value for money.  Quite the contrary in fact; audit work does not attract especially high fees, has high costs of provision and very high insurance costs as a result of fairly high risk of litigation.

All of these factors conspire to mean that audit work is often not undertaken by smaller firms of accountants at all – the risk/ return profile is just not good enough.

Today, I noticed that the UK government had committed to spending up to £10 million for urgent research by eminent scientists into why the population of bees and other pollinating insects is rapidly falling.  Answers are needed soon – bees play an essential role in the food chain that we all depend on.

There are significant amounts of money spent on government research and enquiries. For example, the results of an enquiry into the “Bloody Sunday” killings were announced last week.  This enquiry had reportedly cost £100 million in fees, with a further £91 million in disbursements.  It had also taken fourteen years to reach its conclusions.

Now, I rather doubt that most auditors have the scientific skills necessary to determine the reason for bees’ decline, but I suspect that they do have the skills necessary to identify the key assertions by witnesses to the Bloody Sunday killings, obtain and evaluate sufficient, appropriate evidence and then reach a conclusion.

This process is often known by an alternative name of “auditing”.  Our skills are already used in forensic investigations.  I wonder why people don’t think to use us in other situations where establishing facts is so critical?

With our innate focus on VFM audit and the natural sense of urgency that comes from having to report on financial statements within a matter of months, I can’t help but wonder if auditors would have been able to do the job for less than £191 million and sooner than fourteen years.

Share this entry

Recent articles

View All Articles
You or your boss?
Jun 13, 2024
Title
You or your boss?
Excerpt

So, should you do it or should your boss do it? I’m talking about making decisions and the […]

A takeaway or a fakeaway?
Jun 06, 2024
Title
A takeaway or a fakeaway?
Excerpt

In the final run up to your professional exams it’s often a case of cramming your final revision […]

Peloton’s ride from pandemic peak to rental rebounds
May 30, 2024
Title
Peloton’s ride from pandemic peak to rental rebounds
Excerpt

Whilst home exercise bikes can be a great way to get fit, a lot of people who buy […]

Big 4 under the spotlight…
May 22, 2024
Title
Big 4 under the spotlight…
Excerpt

Recent findings have shown that Britain’s audit firms did not raise alarms for three-quarters of the major companies […]

Better than the professionals?
May 13, 2024
Title
Better than the professionals?
Excerpt

The landscape of investing is evolving, with the rise of retail, or “do-it-yourself” (DIY) investors who are achieving […]

Don’t get angry over anger management
May 07, 2024
Title
Don’t get angry over anger management
Excerpt

Have you ever been angry at work? If you have then you are not alone. The latest Global […]

Cows or dogs in your portfolio?
May 01, 2024
Title
Cows or dogs in your portfolio?
Excerpt

As well as being included in ACCA, CIMA and CMA (USA) exam questions over the years, the Boston […]

KPMG unlocks previously locked up talent.
Apr 30, 2024
Title
KPMG unlocks previously locked up talent.
Excerpt

KPMG, one of the Big Four accounting firms, has recently announced its commitment to expanding its hiring of […]