fb

It took 26 years to find out that he’s not an expert…

One of my friends is a TV producer and he’s recently been working on a documentary that just amazed me and I thought you may enjoy hearing of.

In 2007, Gene Morrison was convicted of a number of serious offences, including perjury.  The reason for this is that he had successfully posed as an expert forensic scientist for some time, having taken some money from people and having even appeared repeatedly as an expert witness in court.

When I say “some time”, I could be more precise: I mean 26 years.

When I say “some money”, I mean over a quarter of a million pounds.

He was one of the favoured expert witnesses used in the Manchester area by the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service.  Why?  Apparently he had a good reputation.  How reliable is reputation as a way to assess somebody’s competence?  Read on…

As my friend was telling me this story, my mind turned to audit standards. In particular, my mind turned to ISA 620 Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert.

In criminal investigations where forensic evidence is important, it’s clearly necessary to obtain expert testimony.  The same applies with specialist areas of accounting that require non-accounting knowledge.  Either the auditor can prove the necessary skills themselves, or can commission an expert.

The problem here is that where evidence comes from somebody who is less expert than they claim to be, evidence that appears to be reliable is actually then worthless. Good quality forensic evidence is destroyed by being handled by a charlatan.

Doctor Gene Morrison MSc PhD (or to give him his full list of titles, Gene Morrison) had run his own company, with the grandiose title of Criminal and Forensic Investigations Bureau (CFIB) on the basis that he obtained the work, then secretly contracted it out to unwitting genuine experts.

He collected the cash, claimed the work as his own and kept almost all of the cash. His knowledge of forensic science appeared to come exclusively from the complete box set of the CSI: Crime Scene Investigation TV shows.

Astoundingly, it appears that in the 700 or so investigations where he provided expert evidence, not one lawyer meaningfully verified his credentials.  His statement that he was an expert appeared to be enough to be considered sufficient.  He appeared as a witness in court many times, somehow bluffing his way through cross examination.

The criminal trial against him was thorough, and the jury found him guilty of 20 of the 21 charges against him.

An auditor following ISA 620 could almost certainly not have been hoodwinked even once by Mr Morrison’s scam.  ISA 620 requires an auditor to verify the existence and quality of any qualifications an expert claims to hold.  Critically, it also requires that the auditor know enough about the subject material to discuss the matter with the expert and reach a concurring opinion with them.  This would surely be impossible with somebody who didn’t know a thing about the subject matter under discussion

He was eventually caught out when privately commissioned by some desperate and grieving parents who wished to know more of the circumstances of the sudden death of their son.  Their dissatisfaction with the bewildering contents of his report caused them to conduct some cursory investigation of their own; shortly followed by a phone call to the police.

Mr Morrison was sent to prison for five years.

 

One of my friends is a TV producer and he’s recently been working on a documentary that just amazed me and I thought you may enjoy hearing of.

 

In 2007, Gene Morrison was convicted of a number of serious offences, including perjury.The reason for this is that he had successfully posed as an expert forensic scientist for some time, having taken some money from people and having even appeared repeatedly as an expert witness in court.

 

When I say “some time”, I could be more precise: I mean 26 years. When I say “some money”, I mean over a quarter of a million pounds. He was one of the favoured expert witnesses used in the Manchester area by the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service. Why? Apparently he had a good reputation. How reliable is reputation as a way to assess somebody’s competence? Read on…

 

As my friend was telling me this story, my mind turned to audit standards. In particular, my mind turned to ISA 620 Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert.

 

In criminal investigations where forensic evidence is important, it’s clearly necessary to obtain expert testimony.The same applies with specialist areas of accounting that require non-accounting knowledge.Either the auditor can prove the necessary skills themselves, or can commission an expert.

 

The problem here is that where evidence comes from somebody who is less expert than they claim to be, evidence that appears to be reliable is actually then worthless. Good quality forensic evidence is destroyed by being handled by a charlatan.

 

Doctor Gene Morrison MSc PhD (or to give him his full list of titles, Gene Morrison) had run his own company, with the grandiose title of Criminal and Forensic Investigations Bureau (CFIB) on the basis that he obtained the work, then secretly contracted it out to unwitting genuine experts.

 

He collected the cash, claimed the work as his own and kept almost all of the cash. His knowledge of forensic science appeared to come exclusively from the complete box set of the CSI: Crime Scene Investigation TV shows.

 

Astoundingly, it appears that in the 700 or so investigations where he provided expert evidence, not one lawyer meaningfully verified his credentials.His statement that he was an expert appeared to be enough to be considered sufficient.He appeared as a witness in court many times, somehow bluffing his way through cross examination.

 

The criminal trial against him was thorough, and the jury found him guilty of 20 of the 21 charges against him.

 

An auditor following ISA 620 could almost certainly not have been hoodwinked even once by Mr Morrison’s scam. ISA 620 requires an auditor to verify the existence and quality of any qualifications an expert claims to hold. Critically, it also requires that the auditor know enough about the subject material to discuss the matter with the expert and reach a concurring opinion with them. This would surely be impossible with somebody who didn’t know a thing about the subject matter under discussion

 

He was eventually caught out when privately commissioned by some desperate and grieving parents who wished to know more of the circumstances of the sudden death of their son. Their dissatisfaction with the bewildering contents of his report caused them to conduct some cursory investigation of their own; shortly followed by a phone call to the police.

 

Mr Morrison was sent to prison for five years.

Share this entry

Recent articles

View All Articles
PwC Australia and the “Rule of Three”
Sep 21, 2023
Title
PwC Australia and the “Rule of Three”
Excerpt

As the future business leaders of tomorrow, it’s crucial for students to stay updated on key developments in […]

CIMA VS ACCA: which is best for you? (and what about CMA?)
Sep 15, 2023
Title
CIMA VS ACCA: which is best for you? (and what about CMA?)
Excerpt

When it comes to a career in accounting or finance, deciding which professional qualification to pursue can be […]

How’s your lipstick?
Sep 12, 2023
Title
How’s your lipstick?
Excerpt

In the world of business, understanding consumer behavior is crucial. The “lipstick effect” offers a fascinating glimpse into […]

How an online Certified Management Accountant (CMA) course can advance your career.
Sep 05, 2023
Title
How an online Certified Management Accountant (CMA) course can advance your career.
Excerpt

In today’s fast-paced and competitive business world, professionals are constantly looking for ways to differentiate themselves and advance […]

Waiting for your ACCA exam results…
Sep 01, 2023
Title
Waiting for your ACCA exam results…
Excerpt

Waiting for the results of your ACCA exams can be an incredibly stressful time. The uncertainty, the anticipation, […]

APM vs AFM ACCA: which path suits your career goals?
Aug 30, 2023
Title
APM vs AFM ACCA: which path suits your career goals?
Excerpt

“Which is easier – Advanced Performance Management (APM) or Advanced Financial Management (AFM)?”

ROI: how enrolling employees on ACCA courses will yield long-term business success
Aug 18, 2023
Title
ROI: how enrolling employees on ACCA courses will yield long-term business success
Excerpt

The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) is one of the most respected global accounting qualifications. Organisations across […]

Would Michael Porter sleep in this bed?
Aug 14, 2023
Title
Would Michael Porter sleep in this bed?
Excerpt

Management theories play a significant role in guiding corporate strategy. And when it comes to strategy and management […]